Self-presentation in the online dating environment pdf

Self-presentation in the online dating environment pdf

Self-presentation in the online dating environment. Deception was expected due to the pdf of the medium e. All the articles claimed meaning in their presentations, but they misrepresented themselves in small, unintentional ways. Overall, the online articles differed from the gender but not significantly enough to be a concern Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment N. Ellison, Rebecca Heino, Jennifer Gibbs Psychology, Computer Science Self-presentation in online dating 1 CHAPTER 1 Introduction From its humble beginnings in whe, n a telephone line was used to wire a computer on the East coast o f the United State tso a computer on the West coast th, e Internet has progressed to a technological

[PDF] Online Dating | Semantic Scholar

To browse Academia. edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. Skip to main content. edu no longer supports Internet Explorer, self-presentation in the online dating environment pdf.

edu uses cookies to personalize content, tailor ads and improve the user experience. By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the use of cookies. To learn more, view our Privacy Policy. Log In Sign Up.

Download Free PDF. Impression Management and Formation in Online Dating Systems. Doug Zytko. Sukeshini Grandhi. Quentin Jones. Download PDF. Download Full PDF Package This paper. A short summary of this paper. READ PAPER. edu Sukeshini Grandhi Eastern Connecticut State University, Willimantic, Connecticut, United States, grandhis easternct. edu Quentin Jones New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, United States, quentin.

jones njit. It has been accepted for inclusion in ECIS Proceedings by an authorized administrator of AIS Electronic Library AISeL. For more information, please contact elibrary aisnet. edu Jones, Quentin, New Jersey Institute of Technology, self-presentation in the online dating environment pdf, Summit Street, Newark, New Jersey, United States, quentin. edu Grandhi, Sukishini A. edu Abstract Online dating systems are used by millions of people every year to find a romantic partner, yet many of these users report feeling frustrated by the online dating process.

This paper presents an interview study in-progress of online dating system use. Findings from 35 users of a popular online dating system in the United States indicate that, contrary to previous research, users typically do not want to deceive their communication partners in order to appear more attractive.

Rather, they try to convey the positive attributes they already possess through private communication methods such as site- native e-mailing. Participants also indicate that primary frustrations with online dating stem from not knowing how other daters are interpreting them and why their conversations end abruptly. These findings suggest that some of the misrepresentation found in prior work may actually be unintentional misinterpretation. Together these findings call for additional feedback mechanisms in the design of online dating systems to inform users about their conveyed impressions.

Keywords: online dating, impression management, feedback, online introductions. I guess he thought it was funny? It made me feel horrible about myself. These systems cater to a variety of user needs. For example, Grindr caters exclusively to homosexual men, Christian Mingle to religious-minded daters, and Self-presentation in the online dating environment pdf to mobile users. Adoption of these systems has grown rapidly to the point that online dating is now second only to meeting through friends as the most common way to meet a romantic partner University of Rochester, In the United States one out of ten people have used an online dating system, an increase from just one out of thirty in Smith and Duggan, Despite this widespread use, studies suggest that users are frustrated Frost et al, self-presentation in the online dating environment pdf.

Previous research has suggested that a lot of this frustration is related to a widely held belief that most online daters intentionally engage in deception or exaggerate portrayals of self in order to appear more attractive Ellison et al.

However, these studies are predominantly based on information conveyed in profile pages Fiore and Donath, ; Toma and Hancock, ; Whitty, ; Ellison et al. In this research we are interested in a holistic understanding of how people convey their desired impression and form impressions of other online daters.

The rest of the paper is structured as follows. We first review previous literature to gain an understanding of the online dating process and identify limitations that lead to our research questions.

We then present an on-going interview study of online daters and our preliminary findings from 35 interviews. We conclude with a discussion on the implications of our findings for the design of online dating systems. In online dating systems, that purpose is for romance. Previous research in online dating systems falls into two main categories: 1 developing algorithms for matching potential partners and 2 impression management of online daters.

Given that our research focuses on how people communicate with one another in online dating systems to convey and form impressions, we have limited our literature review to work that revolves around impression management.

We specifically hone on attributes used to convey impressions and various forms of communication used to convey impression. People want to be seen a certain way, and they do that by attempting to convey their desired impression during communication.

This work is largely based on Social Information Processing SIP Theory, which posits that individuals can take advantage of the reduced cues in computer-mediated communication to selectively self-present, self-presentation in the online dating environment pdf intentionally misrepresent Hall et al.

Yet online daters seldom consider themselves to be deceptive Ellison et al. Other researchers have argued that the goal of online daters is to start a relationship in the real world with other daters, and that deception does not help with this ultimate goal. They found that users are indeed less likely to disclose false information when self-presentation in the online dating environment pdf expect to meet a fellow online dater in person Guadagno et al.

Frost et al. Searchable attributes are objective, demographic qualities such as height, weight, and hobbies, which can be unambiguously conveyed and verified. They can be filtered and searched for within most online dating systems, similar to how one can search for products on Amazon. com or Ebay. Experiential attributes, on the other hand, are subjective and require communicative exchange to convey Frost et al. In not clear how important these experiential attributes are to impression management compared to their searchable counterparts.

com and eHarmony. Users can also communicate privately with one another through private, dyadic conversations. Online dating research has looked at impression management almost exclusively through public profile pages only Fiore and Donath, ; Toma and Hancock, ; Whitty, ; Ellison et al. Our understanding of how users adopt other forms of communication to convey desired impressions and evaluate their potential partners is therefore limited, despite research indicating users do indeed utilize private communication methods Couch and Liamputtong, ; Frost et al.

Existing research has been very quantitative in nature that attempted to find patterns in profile content that influence decisions to message a user Fiore et al.

It should be noted that some of these quantitative studies used artificial profiles or participants that were not necessarily online daters Akehurst et al. Data sets from commercial online dating systems have been studied to uncover patterns between profile pages and messaging behaviour, such as that women receive considerably more messages than men, and users tend to message others that are similar to themselves in terms of attractiveness and life course Fiore and Donath, The few qualitative studies that exist have looked into self-presentation, but did not distinguish between communication methods available and how their use may differ Ellison et al.

Only recently has research began to take a more rounded approach to exploring the frustrations users have with communication in online dating Anon. In particular, we self-presentation in the online dating environment pdf to know if experiential attributes are misrepresented or exaggerated as much as searchable profile attributes.

Lastly, since the goal of online daters is to meet with other online daters in real life, we are seeking to understand how closely interpretations of experiential attributes match with expectations when online daters meet in-person, self-presentation in the online dating environment pdf. Our research questions self-presentation in the online dating environment pdf the following: 1.

How do users adopt public and private methods of communication in online dating systems to 1 self-present experiential attributes and 2 form impressions of others? Do users face any challenges in using various communication methods that hinder their ability to self-present and form impressions of others?

Do users intentionally or unintentionally misrepresent their searchable and experiential attributes? If so, how and why? The participants were between the ages of 19 and 37, and have been users of the system for time spans ranging from 2 months to 5 years. The system allows users to search for public profile pages based on specific demographic criteria, such as gender, age, location, and ethnicity. These searches were filtered based on gender, location, and ethnicity in an attempt to acquire a diverse pool of interview participants.

There are eight different ethnicity choices on the system: white, black, Asian, Indian, Middle Eastern, Hispanic, Native American, and Pacific Islander. With the location criteria remaining constant within 25 milesthere were 16 different search combinations used for finding interview participants 2 self-presentation in the online dating environment pdf x 8 ethnicities.

Users were contacted only once, so if their profile was returned in the top 6 search results in a subsequent week, they were skipped and the next new user in the search results was messaged. Of the users messaged over 8 weeks, 51 responded to message requests for an interview 23 men and 28 women. The other 16 responders who were not interviewed had responded merely to decline the interview offer 10responded with overt sexual advances 2or failed to respond after a time and location for the interview were suggested 4.

The interviews lasted between 28 and 76 minutes and were recorded using a mobile device. While our oldest participant was 37 years old, the chosen online dating system has no age limit, nor does it necessarily cater to a younger demographic.

As such, our findings below may not be representative of all age groups using the online dating system. Grounded Theory was used to analyse our collection of interviews, employing an open coding process to let themes emerge naturally Glaser and Strauss, This research in progress reflects on the first three phases of Grounded Theory—open coding, concepts based on trends found during open codingand categories comprised of related concepts.

Our findings, to date, self-presentation in the online dating environment pdf, reflect categories of concepts that have emerged during these three phases of analysis. Research indicates that the goal of online daters to is meet fellow online daters in person.

Thus, it is important to understand how daters form impressions for making decisions about in-person meetings. Our participants indicated that profile pages alone did not give them enough information for deciding if they want to meet in-person. Rather, all participants needed a combination of public profile and private dyadic communication methods for self-presentation and impression formation purposes.

Site- native e-mail messaging was preferred over the other communication methods available for this purpose, and was used by all participants before meeting a fellow dater in person. I need to talk to the girl first before meeting up like that. When the messages are intellectually stimulating. Sense of humour says a lot about a person.

(PDF) Impression Management and Formation in Online Dating Systems | Doug Zytko - blogger.com

 · This study investigates self-presentation strategies among online dating participants, exploring how participants manage their online presentation of self in order to accom- plish the goal of Psychology, Computer Science. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. This study investigates self-presentation strategies among online dating participants,exploring how participants manage their online presentation of self in order to accom-plish the goal of finding a romantic partner Self Presentation and its Perception in Online Dating Websites Avner Caspi Open University of Israel Online dating sites open a new opportunity to gain insight into self presentation strategies and impression formation effects (Ellison, Heino & Gibbs, ). Although mediated matchmaking is not a new phenomenon, the number of users that login